We use cookies that are necessary to make our site work as well as analytics cookie and third-party cookies to monitor our traffic and to personalise content and ads.
Please click “Cookies Settings” for details on how to withdraw your consent and how to block cookies. For more detailed information about the cookies we use and of who we work this see our cookies notice
Necessary cookies:
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website and cannot be switched off in our systems. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will then not work. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Optional cookies:
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers. We work with third parties and make use of third party cookies to make advertising messaging more relevant to you both on and off this website.
Pink rice serves up alternative to carbon-intensive meat
Article published in the Financial Times, 20 June 2024
The rice is pastel pink. It has a nutty, umami aroma. A slightly brittle texture. But, most surprising of all, each grain contains beef cells. It is a hybrid rice, laced with muscle and fat cells and nurtured in a petri dish to create something novel: part cow, part grain.
According to their calculations, the hybrid rice produces less than a tenth of the carbon of real beef and costs a fraction of the price
Its inventors, academics at Yonsei University in South Korea, wanted to create a sustainable and affordable source of protein – and believe they have done so. According to their calculations, the hybrid rice produces less than a tenth of the carbon of real beef and costs a fraction of the price. Announcing their invention in February, the scientists were evangelical about its potential: “A novel food ingredient that can overcome humanity’s food crisis has been created.”
The pink ‘beef-rice’ is the latest iteration of lab-grown meat to trot on to the burgeoning alternative protein scene. This encompasses everything from burgers crafted from the humble pea to technologically-engineered meat: plant-based, cultivated or fermented foodstuffs that mimic the appearance, taste and texture of animal products.
But while the options for consumers are growing, alternative proteins are yet to take a meaningful bite out of the market for conventional meat. For the food industry, there are two key questions. Can alternative proteins bring down their often too-high costs? And can consumers be persuaded to make the switch?
Less land, less water, lower emissions
Livestock farming contributes 12% of the world’s annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions – more than transport – while also driving habitat destruction and wildlife loss. But, despite international efforts to cut emissions, consumer demand for meat shows little sign of abating, with an expected 50% rise by 20501 as the global population continues to swell. Innovators hope some of that could be met with kinder, healthier, less polluting food sources.
By capturing just 11% of the overall protein market by 2035, alternative proteins could cut GHGs on a scale equivalent to decarbonising the entire aviation industry
To their advocates, alternative proteins are the answer. “The potential is massive,” says Carlotte Lucas, head of industry at Good Food Institute Europe (GFI), an alternative protein think-tank. “We’re facing so many challenges globally, whether climate change, food security or public health, and alternative proteins are one of the key solutions.”
A GFI report that made life-cycle assessments of several products found that alternative proteins use between 47% and 99% less land, between 72% and 99% less water, and emit between 30% and 90% per cent less greenhouse gas than conventional agriculture.2 By capturing just 11% of the overall protein market by 2035, alternative proteins could cut GHGs on a scale equivalent to decarbonising the entire aviation industry.
In the past few years, hundreds of start-ups have entered the market. Sales of plant-based meat grew 74% between 2018 and 20213 as fake steaks, lamb fillets and seafood flushed supermarket shelves. In the heady heydays of 2019, the share price of plant-based food producer Beyond Meat surged 163% on the day it went public, making it the most lucrative launch on Wall Street in two decades4.
Sign up for our newsletter
By contrast, lab-grown meat is a fledgling market, and is yet to reach most consumers. Cell-cultured meat only gained regulatory approval in the US last year; Singapore was the first country to permit its sale in 2020.
And, while the plant-based market once appeared to be on an inexorable ascent, it has since stuttered. Sales have slumped in recent years, spooking investors whose risk appetite has been dampened by global economic stagnation and soaring interest rates.
But many consumers remain unconvinced by faux meat. Numerous reports and surveys have found that products have underwhelmed when it comes to taste, texture and nutrition
I can believe it’s not meat
Another problem is the fact that many consumers remain unconvinced by faux meat. Numerous reports and surveys have found that products have underwhelmed when it comes to taste, texture and nutrition, leaving consumers in no doubt that they are eating only a pale imitation of conventional meat. Companies and scientists are now starting to grapple with this. Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat both relaunched new, ‘meatier’ products this year, with simplified ingredient lists.
Further research is underway. Professor Anwesha Sarkar, a food scientist at Leeds University, has been exploring how to make dry, plant-based products juicer by adding water rather than calories or salt.5 She is sanguine about the feasibility of creating alternative proteins that are both tastier and healthier. “There was a rush to develop products without understanding why they don’t perform,” she says. “We need to understand first, rather than having an addendum approach – keep on adding salt and fat and someday it will work in terms of taste. That’s not the way it works.”
Catalysing investment
Then there is the cost. Plant-based products are more expensive to produce than farm-grown meat; cultivated and fermented products even more so. These stubbornly high costs have exacerbated difficulties with scaling production.
What is needed, says Carlotte Lucas, is government involvement in the form of open research, tax credits, subsidies and funding – that would de-risk the sector and unlock later-stage investment to finance pilot and demo facilities.
The transition will happen – it’s a question of speed
“Governments will play a critical role in enabling the scale-up of the sector,” she explains. “We’ve seen a lot of venture capital coming into the space but, [when] scaling up to the next level, you need later-stage investors.” She points to “bright lights” this year that bode well for the industry – such as Infinite Roots, a German fermentation start-up which has secured EUR 50 million in funding rounds. “There’s definitely still traction in the market,” Lucas says. “The transition will happen – it’s a question of speed.”
Fundamentals first – consolidation creates long-term opportunities
Counterintuitively, some in the industry – such as Rosie Wardle, co-founder and partner at Synthesis Capital, a venture capital manager focussed on the future of food – see the recent downturn in sentiment as a positive. Following the Beyond Meat IPO, there was “a lot of hype in the sector and a lot of over-promising around how quickly the market could grow,” she says. It led to prices becoming over-inflated and hundreds of companies “bandwagon jumping” without offering a differentiated or better product.
The need for these solutions is more critical than ever. For us, investing in what will be the food industry of tomorrow is one of the most promising investment opportunities out there today — but only if the price is right
“Right now, there’s a lot of consolidation happening – mergers, acquisitions – which, for us, is all good news and very healthy for the sector to really build sustainable foundations for the long-term,” she argues. “If you compare investing now to two years ago, we’re in a much better place because prices are much more rational and founders are focussed on the real fundamentals.
“The need for these solutions is more critical than ever. For us, investing in what will be the food industry of tomorrow is one of the most promising investment opportunities out there today — but only if the price is right.”
At Lombard Odier, we believe that changing diets will be a key part of tackling the climate challenge. Around the world, and in Western nations in particular, alternative proteins are set to reduce our consumption of conventional meat and cut the environmental cost of our diets. As we look to meet the targets set by the Paris Climate Agreement, there’s little doubt that alternative-proteins are here to stay. The question is when they will become weekly dinner fare – and just how juicy those burgers will be.
share.